1 tháng 10, 2026 · RES 26-5631
Attachment 1 - 26Q3 Grant Applications Summary and Recommendation
Mở tài liệu gốc ↗
Tóm tắt bằng ngôn ngữ dễ hiểu
Metro gives $1.6 million in planning grants, including Waterfront Park
Metro awarded three planning grants paid for by a regional tax on construction projects. The money pays for design and planning work at Tom McCall Waterfront Park in Portland, the county-owned Vance property in Gresham, and the waterfront in West Linn. A fourth request, from Prosper Portland for the former Regal theater site at Southeast Division Street and 166th Avenue, was not funded.
Decision: Passed, 7 to 0.
Who it affects: People who use Tom McCall Waterfront Park and residents near the Vance site in Gresham and the West Linn waterfront.
Money: Total of $1,622,400: $750,000 to Portland Parks & Recreation to design the whole Waterfront Park redevelopment; $480,000 to Multnomah County for a development plan for the 90-acre Vance property; $392,400 to West Linn for the first phase of its waterfront plan. This reaches Metro's $4 million grant target for 2026.
Next: Metro staff will finalize project plans and grant agreements with each recipient. There will be no more grant rounds in 2026; funding opens again in January 2027.
Official record
Do AI viết từ hồ sơ chính thức và được kiểm tra tự động. 1 tháng 10, 2026
Toàn văn
ATTACHMENT 1
26Q3 GRANT APPLICATIONS SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION
A-1
Applicant Project District Category Amount
Requested
City of Portland,
Parks
Waterfront Park
Redevelopment Part 2
1 Planning Inside
UGB
$750,000
Summary:
Project will provide schematic design for redevelopment of Tom McCall Waterfront Park in its
entirety.
This work is an extension of a prior 2040 grant (ongoing, awarded in 2025) that is funding a
national design competition to identify a design firm to prepare schematic design for the bowl
portion of the park. With this grant, the design firm finalist will be awarded a contract to design
the entire park (including the bowl and the rest of the park).
Project includes topographic survey, additional technical studies, community engagement, and
30% schematic design for park redevelopment.
Screening Committee recommendation: Recommend funding at requested amount, with the
following scope adjustments:
Provide a more detailed timeline and expanded scope of work that show how this grant will
overlap with and/or be incorporated into the timeline and scope for the existing grant.
Clarify what is included in the Task 5 “expenses” line item shown in the proposed budget table.
Describe the City’s strategy for leveraging this grant to source other non-Metro funding.
Applicant Project District Category Amount
Requested
Multnomah County Vance Vision Development
Plan
1 Planning Inside
UGB
$480,000
Summary:
Project will prepare a development plan for the County-owned Vance property, a historically
underinvested 90-acre site in Gresham’s Rockwood/Centennial neighborhoods.
Scope of work includes community and stakeholder engagement, market and financial feasibility
studies, infrastructure studies, transportation system assessments and strategies, and zoning and
development code changes.
The County is partnered with City of Gresham and has a demonstrated history of collaboration
with the city and other partner agencies in planning for the Vance site.
This work is a critical step towards implementation of the Vance Vision, a community-based vision
for future redevelopment of the site (funded through a prior 2040 grant).
Screening Committee Recommendation: Recommend funding at requested amount.
ATTACHMENT A
26Q3 GRANT APPLICATIONS SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION
A-2
Applicant Project District Category Amount
Requested
City of West Linn Waterfront Vision
Implementation Phase 1
2 Planning Inside
UGB
$392,400
Summary:
Project is the first phase of implementing the West Linn Waterfront Vision Plan (adopted by the
City in 2025), which provides a framework for transforming the City’s underutilized waterfront
areas.
This phase will focus on the Historic City Hall district (about 50 acres) and will include
environmental analysis, transportation and infrastructure studies, economic studies and funding
strategies, zoning and development code changes, and engagement and Tribal consultation.
The overall goal is to facilitate reinvestment opportunities, improve multimodal access, provide
access and connections to the river, and highlight the natural and cultural heritage of the area.
Screening Committee Recommendation: Recommend funding at requested amount, with the
following scope adjustments:
1. Provide more detail regarding the scope and cost for community engagement and consider
whether identified budget for engagement is sufficient.
2. Verify assumptions about consultant workload and associated fees and consider adjustments as
needed to ensure adequate resources for the work identified.
Applicant Project District Category Amount
Requested
City of Portland,
Prosper
Regal Site Redevelopment
Concept
1 Planning Inside
UGB
$270,000
Summary:
Project would create a redevelopment concept for the Regal Division site, a 7.5-acre site at
Division Street and 166 th Avenue in Southeast Portland and part of the E205 tax increment
finance (TIF) district.
The site currently includes a former theater building and large surface parking lot.
Outcomes of the project include a community-informed vision for site redevelopment that aligns
with E205 TIF Plan priorities, conceptual land use and redevelopment scenarios, implementation
and phasing strategies, and a “roadmap” for future partnerships and investment attraction.
The site was purchased at auction by Terry Emmert in 2025 and remains under private ownership.
Screening Committee Recommendation: Not recommended for funding at this time for the following
reasons:
The application did not include a detailed scope of work or clearly describe the tasks, deliverables
and outcomes for the project.
The budget identified for community engagement did not appear sufficient to cover the cost of
engagement activities.
There were significant concerns about the property owner, who does not have a documented
history of collaborating with public agencies or investing/redeveloping in ways that benefit the
adjacent communities. The property owner provided a letter of support with the application
stating that he will participate in the planning process, and the application states that the
property owner will sign a memorandum of understanding regarding participation. However, the
committee felt those items were not sufficient to mitigate the risk of planning for a site that the
ATTACHMENT A
26Q3 GRANT APPLICATIONS SUMMARY & RECOMMENDATION
A-3
City does not own or control. The committee also noted that this type of planning work could
increase the value of the property, which could benefit the property owner but does not provide
incentive or leverage for the owner to redevelop the property consistent with community vision.